Horizontal Pod Autoscaler vs Cluster Autoscaler: Understanding the Differences

Horizontal Pod Autoscaler vs Cluster Autoscaler: Understanding the Differences

In the ever-evolving landscape of container orchestration, Kubernetes has become the de facto standard for managing containerized applications. As Kubernetes continues to gain popularity, it's crucial to grasp the nuances of its features, especially when it comes to scaling. Two key components, Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) and Cluster Autoscaler, play pivotal roles in dynamically adjusting the resources of your Kubernetes cluster. In this article, we will delve into the specifics of Horizontal Pod Autoscaler vs Cluster Autoscaler, unraveling their differences and use cases.

Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA):

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler is a Kubernetes resource that automatically adjusts the number of running pods in a deployment or replica set based on observed CPU utilization or other custom metrics. HPA ensures that your application scales horizontally by adding or removing pod replicas to meet the desired resource utilization.

How HPA Works:

  1. Define Metrics:
    To utilize HPA, you need to define the metrics that will trigger the autoscaling. Common metrics include CPU utilization and custom metrics like application-specific performance indicators.

    apiVersion: autoscaling/v2beta2
    kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
    name: example-hpa
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    name: example-deployment
    minReplicas: 2
    maxReplicas: 10
    - type: Resource
    name: cpu
    type: Utilization
    averageUtilization: 70

    In this example, the HPA is configured to adjust the number of replicas in the deployment based on CPU utilization, targeting an average utilization of 70%.

  2. Observation and Scaling:
    HPA continuously monitors the specified metrics. When the observed metrics surpass the defined thresholds, it triggers the scaling process.

  3. Scaling Up/Down:
    If the observed metrics indicate high resource utilization, HPA increases the number of replicas, ensuring that the application can handle increased load. Conversely, if resource utilization is low, HPA scales down the number of replicas to optimize resource usage.

Cluster Autoscaler:

While HPA focuses on scaling pods horizontally within a deployment or replica set, Cluster Autoscaler operates at a higher level, adjusting the size of the entire Kubernetes cluster to accommodate additional resources or release unused capacity.

Implementing Cluster Autoscaler:

  1. Enable Autoscaling:
    First, ensure that your Kubernetes cluster is configured with the necessary permissions for the Cluster Autoscaler. Then, enable autoscaling by adding the following flags to your cluster configuration.


    Adjust the min and max nodes based on your application's requirements.

  2. Monitor Node Utilization:
    Cluster Autoscaler monitors the resource utilization of worker nodes in the cluster. When the utilization exceeds or falls below predefined thresholds, it triggers the scaling process.

    kubectl get nodes

    Use this command to observe the current state of worker nodes, including their CPU and memory utilization.

  3. Automatic Scaling:
    Cluster Autoscaler automatically adjusts the number of worker nodes in the cluster, adding nodes during high demand and removing nodes during periods of low activity.

Horizontal Pod Autoscaler vs Cluster Autoscaler: A Quick Comparison:

FeatureHorizontal Pod AutoscalerCluster Autoscaler
Scaling Based OnMetrics (e.g., CPU)Node resource utilization
Adjustment TypeHorizontal (pods)Vertical (nodes)
Resource TargetsIndividual DeploymentsEntire Cluster
Use CaseApplication-levelCluster-wide

Understanding the distinctions between Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and Cluster Autoscaler is vital for efficiently managing and scaling your Kubernetes environment. While HPA excels at adjusting pod replicas based on metrics within a deployment, Cluster Autoscaler focuses on dynamically resizing the entire cluster to meet broader resource demands. Employing both components judiciously ensures optimal performance and resource utilization in a Kubernetes deployment.

Related Searches and Questions asked:

  • Kubernetes Autoscaling Commands
  • Understanding Kubernetes Autoscaling Pods
  • Understanding Kubernetes Autoscaling Custom Metrics
  • Kubernetes Autoscaling Types
  • That's it for this topic, Hope this article is useful. Thanks for Visiting us.